Ramadan in Tehran's underground
The taste of forbidden fruit
۲۹ مرداد ۱۳۸۹
■ N. Sayeh
You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “The taste of forbidden fruit”.

کلیدواژه ها: N. Sayeh, ramadan |
Print | نشر مطلب































What do you think would happen with the dutylike character of Ramadan when the obligation would change into a free choice? Would there be a huge downfall and loss of rituals or would (young) people start to develope their own traditions as some kind of substitute? If so, would those new or adapted traditions become an obligation for the next generation? In other words, forbidden fruits always seem to be part of religion and culture, but the strength of pressure can be very different of course.. In fact, my own neighbours don’t allow their children to spend money on Sundays, which is absurd to me. These children sometimes challenge their parents, which also feels like eating forbidden fruits. The joy is great, the fear of being caught too. It’s like a cat and mouse game . . . but in Iran a very serious one so to speak. It’s a pity however that spirtual roots in religion(s) are being forced and desacrificed into this kind of ‘game’, isn’t it?
Nice story by the way. Especially the difference in how people cope with this pressure and it’s consequences.
You are right Karin, the only point is our cat and mouse game in Iran longed for more than 30 years and this makes it absolutely frustrating with all of difficulties this game made for us. dear Karin, its great if you be free to choose your own game to play. Freedom is always great!
Freedom of choice in Iran (and everywhere) certainly should be the right of every single person, I agree with that. I didn’ t mean to bluntly compare the pressure I experience in my country with the pressure in Iran, because the source of the pressure is totally different (regime and personal related), but the process of pressure and what people tend to do with it are comparable I think.
In a free country as well as in a country like Iran, people resist against pressures because they want to be able to follow their own way. The longer and harder pressure is being forced into people’s lifes, the more severe resistance will get and yes, definitely more and more frustrating! I am just wondering how great a risk there is, for this frustration to turn into it’s own supressive way of thinking and acting when freedom finally would be achieved.
Even here, in my free country, there are people with radical anti-religion statements because of being raised at a bible belt place (the fundamental christian churches). They have developed a strong aversion against their church and parents , because of the suppresive way of religious standards they were expected to respect.
That;s okay with me and I totally understand their reaction for themselves, but the respectable and let’s say ‘normal’ , less fundamental group of believers are being connected with this too.
A proces of generalization starts controlling the new born freedom, which is not okay!
I gues I can say this for Islamic believers in my country too. The radical believers are being misused by people like Geert Wilders, to discredit all muslims and every Islamic way of believing. The radical anti-islamic ones, being sick of their personal slamic roots in the way they have experienced them (Ayaan Hirsi Ali for instance) take all others (the peaceful and respectful as well) with them in their battle against religious pressures.
It’s sad that a minor anti-group with influence is the cause of terrible judgements of a major group of harmless, respectful and peaceful religious people. This small anti-group with influence at political platforms, is promoting hate and fear, as the legitimate truth. Alas too many people are vulnerable for this easy way of making other people responsible for all the bad things in the world. People want to be guided in some way and nothing easier than blaming others. It makes one feel superior, strong and victimized and gives them a right *they think* to attack and destroy.
That’s what I meant: a suprresive life, may end up in another suppresive life, with a freedom being harassed by personal suffering. Sad, very sad and not a position religion ever was meant to be in.
Thank God or Allah (whatever) for the people who take or get their freedom in a peaceful way without hate or feelings of revenge. Not easy I think, but the only way a religion may be used in my humble opinion
Hope I made things more clear now
But yes, I’m totally aware that my freedom is precious, though my country doesn’t feel like a place where freedom is being respected for everyone anymore. I’m free, but sense too much hate and fear around me and that feels awful.
Free countries have their own means of suppression I guess . . . .